February 8, 2012

Q&A: What would be so wrong about holding the banks accountable and creating more consumer protections?

Question by Shuthrower: What would be so wrong about holding the banks accountable and creating more consumer protections?
Last Friday, all 41 Republicans in the Senate announced that they would stand with the big banks to oppose Wall Street reform legislation. To me, that’s a smack in the face of every American who has been affected by all the fraud perpetrated on us. When you stand with special interests and then threaten to filibuster what you can’t defeat with a vote, your just a corporate puppet and you don’t deserve the honor of working in the “peoples house”.

Best answer:

Answer by Capitalist and proud of it
This is typical liberal argument. Why do you assume that because this bill stinks of special interest protections, etc., that we’re against reform? We just want it done right – not like Obamacare.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

If I Were a Mediocre White Man I Would Write an Advice Column For Poor Black Kids in Forbes Magazine

Poor_knights_islands_perfect_day 30.07.10 (30)
poor

Image by A Perfect Day, Poor Knights Islands
Perfect Day at the Poor Knights Islands.

The President’s speech got me thinking. My kids are no smarter than similar kids their age from the inner city. My kids have it much easier than their counterparts from West Philadelphia. The world is not fair to those kids mainly because they had the misfortune of being born two miles away into a more [...]


Related Stories

  • Will Blackwater Ever Do Right?
  • “Massa” Rush Limbaugh Wants Black Politicians to Be Sure to Have Their Slave Passes
  • Former Slaves Speak Across Time and the NY Times Recycles the Myth of the Black Confederate Soldier

AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed

If Steve Jobs Had Been President Do You Think He Would Have Put Up With Congress and Their Shenanigans?

Steve-Jobs

When I say Shenanigans, I am referring to the inability of congress to do much of anything, except the bidding of “big business”, rather than the people that voted them into office. Just imagine that, if Steve Jobs had jumped into politics and became president, how different things on Capital Hill would have been.

Think about this for a moment.

I honestly believe that if Steve had political aspirations, ran for, and became president, congress would have sung a different tune and actually doing the job they were elected to do. Corporate lobbyists would have had a tough time in Washington, and I do believe that we would have a balanced budget. Steve, God rest his soul, would have taken control and ran our government like it should have been.

There would be no “pork” in bills created by congressional representatives, you can bet on that. We would not be spending trillions of dollars on useless wars in the name of oil interests, congress would not be using social security as a slush fund and Wall Street would not have been bailed out.

I do truly believe in my heart that if someone such as Steve Jobs or a likeminded individual were elected to the presidential office we would not be sitting in the middle of a double dip recession and worrying about where our next paycheck was coming from. Because people like Steve Jobs can changes things on a global scale.

Thank you Steve for all that you did while on this earth and I truly hope your legacy at Apple lives on. You touched me in many ways, and while I will never achieve what you did, you are still and forever will be an inspiration to me.

FMD Consumer News

Across-the-Board Spending Cap Would Have Devastating Consequences for Real People

Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act
Consumer

Image by Public Citizen
(Photo by Joe Newman)

For American consumers, this has been the year of living dangerously. A record number of product recalls this year and last — many involving dangerous toys — put American children and families at greater risk than ever before. But with the U.S. Senate passing the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act Thursday night, after the House passed it Wednesday, there may finally be reason to think that things might get better.

Sen. Dick Durbin.

Read more at Citizen Vox.

Across-the-Board Spending Cap Would Have Devastating Consequences for Real People
Consumer and provider groups come together to highlight real-world impact WASHINGTON, June 22, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Consumer and health care provider groups today released a study that highlights the real-world impact across-the-board spending cuts in federal programs could have on some of our nation’s most vulnerable people, including the elderly, children and low-income families …
Read more on redOrbit

FDA Examines Ways to Improve Consumer Understanding of Prescription Drug Ads
SILVER SPRING, Md., June 20, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Findings from three studies conducted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration confirm that the way information is conveyed and displayed in printed drug advertising affects consumer understanding of prescription medications.
Read more on PR Newswire via Yahoo! News

Cobra to Showcase Cobra Tag and Other Consumer and Mobile Electronics Innovations at gdgt live in New York
Cobra Electronics Corporation , celebrating 50 years of innovation in 2011 as a leading designer and manufacturer of award-winning consumer and mobile electronics, today announced it will showcase some of its newest and most innovative new consumer electronics devices as a sponsor of gdgt live in NY, a high energy gadget showcase which kicks off the CEA’s CE Week in New York City. Â The event …
Read more on PR Newswire via Yahoo! Finance

Anyone know how I would go about filing for consumer fraud? Got taken by Forresters Financial Trust.?

consumer fraud
by quapan

Question by tasteekake69: Anyone know how I would go about filing for consumer fraud? Got taken by Forresters Financial Trust.?

Best answer:

Answer by regerugged
If you are in the US, contact your state’s consumer protection bureau. If there is none, contact your state’s Attorney General.

Add your own answer in the comments!

Return to weekly rubbish collection ‘would damage UK recycling’

Analysis by government’s waste quango shows change would send nearly 1.5 million tonnes of recyclables to landfill

Controversial government plans to reintroduce weekly waste collections could lead to more than 1 million extra tonnes of recyclable material being sent to landfill each year, according to the government’s own analysis.

This would reduce the UK’s overall recycling rate by several percentage points and raise serious questions about its ability to meet EU recycling and landfill diversion targets.

Significantly, the change would cost councils £530m over the next four years, the analysis says, because councils would have to run more collection vehicles and pay extra disposal costs. The figures are revealed today by environment business magazine the Ends Report, and are based on figures provided by the government’s waste quango, Wrap.

More than 170 English councils (48%) have fortnightly collections of “black bag” rubbish, which have been hailed for increasing recycling rates. Evidence shows that less frequent rubbish collections encourage people to recycle more in order to avoid over-filling their bins. But since the May election, the environment secretary, Caroline Spelman, and communities secretary, Eric Pickles, have been pushing for a return to weekly collections. In August, local government minister Bob Neill even urged councils to hold referendums on the issue, claiming that fortnightly collections “cause problems with fly-tipping, odour and vermin”.

The environment department, Defra, is conducting a review of waste policy that includes looking at measures to increase frequency. However, the government’s analysis – undertaken by its waste quango, Wrap – raises questions about the effectiveness of the new policy.

The analysis says that if weekly collections were reintroduced, the amount of paper, plastic and cans put out for recycling could drop by 30-46kg per household per annum. The amount of garden and kitchen waste put out for recycling could drop by up to 100kg for each household. If these figures are extrapolated across 48% of English households, this would involve up to 1.5m tonnes of recyclables being dumped in landfill – equivalent to almost 5% of England’s household waste.

Wrap’s analysis assumes that the pro-recycling behaviour change caused by the introduction of fortnightly collections is gradually reversed. If that change happened, the amount of waste England households recycle would drop from 37.6% to 31.7%. This would damage the UK’s ability to meet an EU target to recycle 50% of its household waste by 2020.

Julian Kirby, Friends of the Earth’s waste campaigner, said: “Far from combining deficit cuts with being the greenest government ever, the coalition looks set to cut recycling while heaping extra costs on cash-strapped councils. High [levels of] recycling saves cash and resources while creating many, many more jobs than landfill or incineration.”

No council bodies would comment openly on the figures. But one told ENDS on condition of anonymity: “There’s a general feeling among councils that [going weekly] is a stupid idea, and these figures just show why. Fortnightly collections have been accepted as good practice for two years and that’s why more than half English councils have made the move.”

Rebecca Smithers


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Environment: Ethical and green living | guardian.co.uk

National Soda Tax Would Make Americans 4% Less Fat

Cross-posted from Treehugger.
The USDA has recently been delving into the potential benefits of enacting a tax on sugary beverages like sodas and fruit juices. Clearly, there’s plenty to debate about such a tax — whether it would raise soda prices enough to discourage consumption, whether it would unfairly impact the poor, [...]

AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed

National Soda Tax Would Make Americans 4% Less Fat

the hand of a poor gecko
poor

Image by bernat…
the hand of this poor gecko

la ma d’un pobre dragó
la mà d’aquest pobre dragó

Please, consider to view my most interesting shots acording to flickr and my photos on explore

Safe Creative. If you want to use this image please add in a visible place near the photo: "Photo: Bernat Casero" (link included, please)

take a look at your contacts activity or at your recent photos in explore front page

?

EXPLORE #343 thank you very much for your comments and favorites…

Cross-posted from Treehugger.
The USDA has recently been delving into the potential benefits of enacting a tax on sugary beverages like sodas and fruit juices. Clearly, there’s plenty to debate about such a tax — whether it would raise soda prices enough to discourage consumption, whether it would unfairly impact the poor, [...]

AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed

National Soda Tax Would Make Americans 4% Less Fat

pOOr…. buT hAppY…
poor

Image by poonomo
i saw her while i visited neyyar dam during my last kerala trip… portraits aint really my cuppa tea, but this grandma trying to sell a few fruits and some packets of peanuts, sittin under the scorching april sun, moved me a lot… n for a few seconds, my mind wandered over to those days ven my grandma was alive, about the life she led during her old age and the comforts she was given… and i was thinking about how miserable this granny’s situation mite be at home, that at this age, she has to try and sell a few packets of peanuts to satisfy her hunger and maybe of all those back home waiting for her to come back with some food or money…

n while she was busy handing over a packet of peanuts to my dad, i clikd my first shot, and maybe hearing the shutter sound, she turned around n looked at me… am not sure if she understood what i was doing, but ven she heard my dad tell her what am up to, she smiled at me… n for a moment, i felt glad… we gave her another 20-rupee note and told her to keep it, but this poor soul thot we were asking for more peanuts… :o ) … finally, somehow my dad convinced her to keep that extra money n we left the place…

there are many who are still living amidst poverty, but we hardly ever notice them… rather we dont want to (me included) … n while i was browsing the net on various topics related to poverty, i came across this very powerful quote – The poverty of our century is unlike that of any other. It is not, as poverty was before, the result of natural scarcity, but of a set of priorities imposed upon the rest of the world by the rich. Consequently, the modern poor are not pitied…but written off as trash. The twentieth-century consumer economy has produced the first culture for which a beggar is a reminder of nothing. ~John Berger

maybe its the money we gave her that brot about this smile on her face… maybe its the thot of food, what this money can get her, that brot about this smile on her face… maybe its the thot of what she can take home for her grandchildren that brot about this smile on her face… or maybe its the fact that she was fotografed that brot about this smile on her face… whatever may the reason be, all i know is i left that place with a smile on my face… :)

Cross-posted from Treehugger.
The USDA has recently been delving into the potential benefits of enacting a tax on sugary beverages like sodas and fruit juices. Clearly, there’s plenty to debate about such a tax — whether it would raise soda prices enough to discourage consumption, whether it would unfairly impact the poor, [...]

AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed

Powered by Yahoo! Answers