May 21, 2012

Consumer Reporting Agency Teletrack to Pay $1.8 Million for Fair Credit Reporting Act Violations

CES 2011 – Consumer Electronics Show – Las Vegas, NV
consumer

Image by David Berkowitz
Consumer Electronics Show (CES) 2011 – Las Vegas, NV
(cc) David Berkowitz www.marketersstudio.com

money-walletTeletrack, Inc. has agreed to pay .8 million to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it sold credit reports to marketers, in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). This settlement seeks to protect consumers’ privacy by ensuring that their sensitive credit report information is not sold for marketing purposes.

According to the FTC’s complaint, as part of its business Teletrack sells credit reports and other services to businesses – such as payday lenders, rental purchase stores, and non-prime rate auto lenders – that mainly serve financially distressed consumers. These businesses use Teletrack’s credit reports to decide whether and on what terms to provide credit to their customers.

The complaint alleges that Teletrack created a marketing database of information that it gathered through its credit reporting business. It then sold the information in this database – including lists of consumers who had applied for non-traditional credit products – to marketers. For example, Teletrack sold lists of consumers who previously sought payday loans to third parties that wanted to use this information to target potential customers. The FTC’s complaint alleges that these marketing lists were credit reports under the FCRA because they contained information about a consumer’s creditworthiness. The FTC charges that Teletrack violated the FCRA, which makes it illegal to sell credit reports without a specific “permissible purpose” under the statute; marketing is not a permissible purpose.

“The fact that a consumer has applied for a payday loan is credit report information protected by the FCRA,” said FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection Director David Vladeck.
“The FCRA says a credit reporting agency like Teletrack can’t sell a consumer’s sensitive credit report information for mere sales pitches.”

The settlement order resolving the FTC’s charges requires Teletrack to furnish credit reports only to those people that it has reason to believe have a permissible purpose to receive them under the FCRA, or as otherwise allowed by the FCRA. It also requires Teletrack to pay a civil penalty of .8 million, and contains reporting and record-keeping requirements to ensure the company’s compliance with the decree.

The Commission vote to authorize the staff to refer the complaint to the Department of Justice, and to approve the proposed order, was 5-0. The DOJ filed the complaint and proposed order on behalf of the Commission in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on June 24, 2011. The proposed order is subject to court approval.

Source: FTC

United States of America, Plaintiff v. Teletrack, Inc., Defendant
(United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia)
Case No. 1:11-CV-2060
FTC File No. 102 3075

FMD Consumer News

Court Bans Defendants from Selling Work-at-Home and Grant Scams, and Orders Them to Pay $10.4 Million

CES 2011 – Consumer Electronics Show – Las Vegas, NV
consumer

Image by David Berkowitz
Consumer Electronics Show (CES) 2011 – Las Vegas, NV
(cc) David Berkowitz www.marketersstudio.com

Court-JusticeA federal judge has ruled in favor of the Federal Trade Commission and ordered Real Wealth, Inc. and its owner, Lance Murkin, to pay .4 million, the full amount of harm caused to thousands of consumers nationwide who were victimized by the Defendants’ work-at-home and grant scams.  The Court also banned Real Wealth and Murkin from marketing or selling work-at-home or grant-related products, and from assisting others in doing so.

The judgment against Real Wealth and Murkin is part of an ongoing FTC crackdown on scams that are aimed at unemployed Americans.  Defendants Real Wealth and Murkin conned thousands of consumers nationwide with a direct-mail campaign that sometimes targeted the elderly and disabled.  They deceptively marketed and sold booklets that supposedly explained how to earn money by working from home or applying for government grants.

The defendants lured consumers with deceptive sales pitches, such as “Collect up to ,250 with my simple 3 minute form” or “All I do is mail 30 postcards everyday and I make an extra 0 a week!”  The defendants also claimed that consumers could “rake in up to ,500+ per week or more in solid cash” by learning “secrets” about the “0 billion banking industry bailout.”

The Court agreed with the FTC that these claims were false or unsubstantiated, in violation of the FTC Act, and it granted the FTC’s motion for summary judgment against the defendants.  Few, if any, consumers made substantial income with the defendants’ products.

The FTC filed its complaint against Real Wealth and Murkin as part of the “Operation Bottom Dollar” law enforcement sweep announced in February 2010 that included seven FTC cases against the operators of deceptive and illegal job and money-making scams, as well as dozens of other actions filed by the U.S. Department of Justice and state attorneys general.

The FTC thanks the U.S. Postal Inspection Service for its work in connection with this case, and thanks AARP Legal Counsel for the Elderly, which referred this case to the FTC.  The FTC filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri.  The court issued the judgment on May 17, 2011.

Source FTC

Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Real Wealth Inc., a corporation, also doing business as American Financial Publications, Emerald Press, Financial Research, National Mail Order Press, Pacific Press, United Financial Publications, Wealth Research Marketing Group, and Wealth Research Publications, and Lance Murkin, individually and as an officer of Real Wealth, Inc., Defendants

(United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri Western Division)
Civil Action No. 4:10-cv-00060-FJG
FTC File No. 092 3207

FMD Consumer News

BBB’s “Secure Your ID” Day Shreds Nearly a Million Pounds of Materials Across the Nation

Posted on 5/10/2011 by
Arlington, VA – Nearly 13,000 vehicles descended on 53 sites across the U.S. Saturday, April 16, all filled with boxes and bags of sensitive documents to be shredded free of charge during Better Business Bureau’s seventh “Secure Your ID” Day community service event. A tremendous success, BBB saw consumers and small business owners from 20 states deliver more than 900,800 lbs (450.4 tons) of materials for safe, responsible destruction.  

“For four consecutive years now, BBB has provided identity theft prevention solutions for consumers and business owners with easy-to-use services and programs like BBB ‘Secure Your ID’ Day,” said Stephen A. Cox, President and CEO for the Council of Better Business Bureaus. “None of us can afford to take a passive approach to identity theft – the issue requires action.”

Last year alone, 8.1 million Americans became victims of ID theft, resulting in the loss of billion, according to a 2011 report from Javelin Strategy and Research. Despite the drop in instances from 2009, those who suffered from identity theft last year faced higher consequences, the study found. The average out-of-pocket loss nearly doubled, going from 7 to 1 per incident.

Education is one of the most important ways BBB works toward building trust in today’s marketplace. BBB’s “Secure Your ID” Day is a great way for consumers and small businesses alike to take a key step in identity protection. Looking ahead, BBB is excited to continue to the success of last year’s two “Secure Your ID” Days where BBB helped individuals and small businesses at more than 133 sites across the country shred 1.3 million pounds of sensitive documents—all for free. With great expectation and anticipation, the next Secure Your ID Day event is scheduled for October 22, 2011.

For more information on BBB “Secure Your ID Day” and identity theft prevention measures for both consumers and businesses, visit www.bbb.org/us/secureID.

About BBB

As the leader in advancing marketplace trust, Better Business Bureau is an unbiased non-profit organization that sets and upholds high standards for fair and honest business behavior. Every year, more than 65 million consumers rely on BBB Business Reviews® and BBB Wise Giving Reports® to help them find trustworthy businesses and charities across North America. Visit www.bbb.org/us for more information.

BBB Blog RSS Feed

Refunds Totaling More Than $11.8 Million to Consumers Defrauded by Q-Ray Bracelet Scam

CES 2011 – Consumer Electronics Show – Las Vegas, NV
consumer

Image by David Berkowitz
Consumer Electronics Show (CES) 2011 – Las Vegas, NV
(cc) David Berkowitz www.marketersstudio.com

An administrator working for the Federal Trade Commission is mailing 248,931 refund checks to consumers defrauded by QT Inc., Q-Ray Company, and Bio-Metal, Inc., and their owner, Que Te Park, also known as Andrew Q. Park, who made false and misleading advertising claims that the Q-Ray bracelet provided immediate and significant pain relief and deceptively advertised their refund policy.

More than .8 million is being returned to people who purchased the Q-Ray bracelet and filed a claim form. Purchasers will receive an average of about . Consumers who receive the checks should cash them by mid-June 2011. The FTC never requires consumers to pay money or provide information before redress checks can be cashed. Q-Ray consumers with questions should call the redress administrator, Analytics Inc., at 800-269-0056 or visit the FTC’s Q-Ray bracelet webpage.

Source: FTC

Federal Trade Commission v. QT, Inc.; Q-Ray, Company; Bio-Metal, Inc.; Que Te Park, also known as Andrew Q. Park; and Jung Joo Park (Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division).  Case No. 03C 3578;  FTC File No. 032 3011

FMD Consumer News

Regulators Recover Additional $2.1 Million for Consumers Defrauded by AmeriDebt Scam

Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act
consumer

Image by Public Citizen
(Photo by Joe Newman)

For American consumers, this has been the year of living dangerously. A record number of product recalls this year and last — many involving dangerous toys — put American children and families at greater risk than ever before. But with the U.S. Senate passing the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act Thursday night, after the House passed it Wednesday, there may finally be reason to think that things might get better.

Read more at Citizen Vox.

On March 9, an administrator working for the Federal Trade Commission mailed 78,552 refund checks to consumers defrauded by a credit counseling/debt management scam run by Andris Pukke and his companies, AmeriDebt, Inc. and DebtWorks, Inc. The FTC alleged that the defendants deceived consumers about the fees for debt management plans and misrepresented that AmeriDebt was a non-profit, in addition to making false promises to teach consumers how to handle their credit and finances.

The FTC previously returned almost million to consumers in this scam. The distribution of more than .1 million announced today is the result of additional funds collected from the defendants, and the amount of each check will vary based upon the amount of each consumer’s loss.

Consumers who receive the checks should cash them by May 9, 2011. The FTC never requires consumers to pay money or provide information before redress checks may be cashed. Consumer victims who have not previously filed a complaint with the FTC may still do so. AmeriDebt consumers with questions should call the redress administrator, Gilardi & Co., LLC , at 888-309-3816 or visit www.ftc.gov/ameridebt.

Source: FTC

Federal Trade Commission v. AmeriDebt, Inc., DebtWorks, Inc., Andris Pukke, and Pamela Pukke, also known as Pamela Shuster (District of Maryland)
Civil Action No.: PJM 03-3317;
FTC File No. X040009

RELATED STORIES

Regulator Puts an End to Chikita’s Tactics of Online Advertising That Deceived Consumers

American Express Bank Violating the Credit Repair Organizations Act Using a Debt Collection Letter?

Regulator Steps Up Efforts Against Scams That Target Financially-Strapped Consumers

Debt Collector Portfolio Recovery Associates Sending out Bogus IRS 1099-C’s to Consumers Again?

FMD Consumer News

Debt Collector West Asset Management to Pay a Record 2.8 Million for Abusing Consumers

A leading debt collection company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of .8 million to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that its aggressive collection techniques violated federal law. As part of its efforts to protect consumers affected by the struggling economy, the FTC alleged that West Asset Management, Inc. violated the FTC Act and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

According to the FTC’s complaint, thousands of consumer complaints have been filed against West Asset Management Inc., which employs 1,500 debt collectors in 13 states and one offshore location. West Asset Management debt collectors allegedly violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by calling consumers multiple times each day, often regarding accounts that did not belong to them, and sometimes using rude and abusive language. The FTC further charged that West Asset Management also illegally disclosed the existence of consumers’ debts to third parties and ignored consumers’ written demands that West Asset Management stop calling them.

The company also allegedly withdrew funds from consumers’ bank accounts or charged their credit cards without consent and falsely claimed that consumers would be sued, arrested, or have their property seized for nonpayment of their debt. In addition, the FTC alleged that West Asset Management falsely claimed that partial payments would be accepted as full settlement on accounts and that negative information would stay on consumers’ credit reports until debts were paid. According to the complaint, West Asset Management has collected on more than 24 million accounts on behalf of clients in the healthcare, telecommunications, consumer credit, and government service industries.

The settlement imposes a .8 million civil penalty, which is the largest civil penalty obtained by the FTC in a debt collection case. The settlement order permanently prohibits West Asset from using false, deceptive or unfair debt collection tactics, including:

  • Misrepresenting itself as a law firm or that its collectors are attorneys;
  • Misrepresenting that debtors will be arrested or have their property seized if they don’t pay;
  • Threatening actions that would be illegal, or actions that the company has no intention of taking;
  • Making false statements to collect a debt or obtain information about a consumer;
  • Withdrawing funds from consumers’ bank accounts or charging their credit cards without their consent;
  • Depositing postdated checks before the date on the check, or threatening to do so;
  • Revealing to third parties that a consumer owes a debt;
  • Asking a third party for a consumer’s location information more than once without the third party’s consent or a reasonable belief that the person’s earlier response was wrong or incomplete and that the person now has correct location information;
  • Calling consumers before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m., or at their workplace;
  • Communicating with a consumer after receiving written notice that the consumer refuses to pay or wants the collector to stop calling; and
  • Using obscene or profane language, or harassing consumers with repeated phone calls.

Source: FTC

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. West Asset Management, Inc., Defendant
(United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia)

Case No. 1:11-cv-0746
File No. 0723006

 

RELATED STORIES

Regulator Puts an End to Chikita’s Tactics of Online Advertising That Deceived Consumers

American Express Bank Violating the Credit Repair Organizations Act Using a Debt Collection Letter?

Regulator Steps Up Efforts Against Scams That Target Financially-Strapped Consumers

Debt Collector Portfolio Recovery Associates Sending out Bogus IRS 1099-C’s to Consumers Again?

 

About the Author

Allen Harkleroad, “the most dangerous consumer in America” and the author of the book Stick it to Sue Happy Debt Collectors. The book has saved countless consumers from the clutches of abusive debt collectors and shady debt collection law firms. Allen Harkleroad is a veteran of beating bad debt collectors, whether it defending himself in court or suing them for violating the law. Allen is an avid and judicious consumer advocate who enjoys helping others. In addition to consumer advocacy he enjoys writing and blogging on various technology and business subjects.

Books and Guides by the Author

Stick it to Sue Happy Debt Collectors

The Care and Feeding of a Sucks.com Protest Website

Confidential SEO Secrets

Quick and Dirty Self Publishing Guide for Print Publishing – PDF | Kindle | Nook (Kindle and Nook .99 a copy)

Dealing with Debt Collectors and How to Take Away Their Power – Kindle | Nook (Kindle and Nook .99 a copy)

FMD Consumer News

DIRECTV’s $1 Million Settlement

Posted on 12/20/2010 by America Monge
DIRECTV has landed a million settlement with the state of Washington after receiving complaints from virtually every state in the country. Since Washington was the first to sue DIRECTV over a year ago, DIRECTV came to a settlement and agreed to pay million in legal cost and compensate consumers with unresolved complaints.

Of the many complaints filed against DIRECTV, failure to disclose clear information of all terms and conditions was at the top of the list. Many of the consumers stated having been “hit with a two fold fee after early termination;” something, they say, that was never explained to them. Many of the early terminations of the service were mostly due to repeated signal problems at consumers homes.

Read more: http://www.komonews.com/news/consumer/111897449.html
BBB Blog RSS Feed

DIRECTV Comes to a $1 Million Settlement

Posted on 12/15/2010 by America Monge
DIRECTV has landed a million settlement with the state of Washington after receiving complaints from virtually every state in the country. Since Washington was the first to sue DIRECTV over a year ago, DIRECTV came to a settlement and agreed to pay million in legal cost and compensate consumers with unresolved complaints.

Of the many complaints filed against DIRECTV, failure to disclose clear information of all terms and conditions was at the top of the list. Many of the consumers stated having been “hit with a two fold fee after early termination;” something, they say, that was never explained to them. Many of the early terminations of the service were mostly due to repeated signal problems at consumers homes.

Read more: http://www.komonews.com/news/consumer/111897449.html
BBB Blog RSS Feed

$3.6 Million Judgment Against Companies that Allegedly Debited Money from Consumers’ Bank Accounts

At the request of the Federal Trade Commission, a federal court has entered a judgment of more than .6 million against a payment processor and its subsidiary that allegedly debited consumers’ bank accounts illegally on behalf of deceptive telemarketers. According to a 2007 complaint filed by the FTC and seven states, Your Money Access, LLC and its subsidiary, YMA Company, LLC, processed unauthorized debits on behalf of deceptive telemarketers and Internet-based schemes that were violating the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule and state consumer protection laws. The companies played a critical role in these schemes by providing access to the banking system and the means to extract money from consumers’ bank accounts. The FTC alleged that in many instances the merchants either failed to deliver the promised products or services or sent consumers relatively worthless items.

A default judgment entered in October 2008 barred Your Money Access and YMA Company from payment processing for any client whose business practices are deceptive, unfair, or abusive within the meaning of the FTC Act, the Telemarketing Sales Rule, and state consumer protection laws.

The states joining the FTC’s complaint were Illinois, Iowa, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, and Vermont.
Source: FTC

FMD Consumer Blog

Deceptive Marketers Banned from Selling Mortgage Relief Services; One Defendant Ordered to Pay $11.5 Million

Eight marketers are banned from selling mortgage modification or foreclosure relief services under settlements with the Federal Trade Commission. The FTC alleged that the marketers charged homeowners up-front fees and falsely claimed they could get their mortgage loans modified or prevent foreclosure on their homes. The settlements in three separate actions are part of the FTC’s ongoing efforts against scams that target financially distressed consumers.

The FTC settled with the following defendants:
Federal Loan Modification Law Center. Steven Oscherowitz settled FTC charges that he and others advertised and sold a so-called “Federal Loan Modification program.” They charged up to ,000, much of which they required up-front, but Federal Loan Modification often failed to live up to the promised results, according to the FTC’s complaint. (4/6/2009 release http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/04/hud.shtm). The settlement order against Oscherowitz permanently bans him from selling mortgage relief services and from telemarketing any good or service. Under the order, Oscherowitz also is prohibited from misrepresenting any good or service, selling or otherwise benefitting from customers’ personal information, and failing to dispose of customer information properly. The order imposes an .5 million judgment against Oscherowitz, which represents the amount consumers paid to the defendants while he was involved in the alleged scheme. Any money collected to satisfy the judgment will be paid to injured consumers if practicable, or to the U.S. Treasury as disgorgement of ill-gotten gains. Two individual and three corporate defendants already have settled charges against them in this case, and the FTC continues to pursue its case against five other defendants.

Loss Mitigation Services. Dean Shafer, Marion Anthony “Tony” Perry, and Bernadette Perry, also known as Bernadette Carr and Bernadette Carr-Perry, settled allegations that they falsely promised that a loan modification was assured or virtually assured if consumers paid an advance fee of up to ,500. Shafer and the Perrys, who were principals of Loss Mitigation Services, Inc. (LMS) and Synergy Financial Management Corporation, doing business as Direct Lender or DirectLender.com (Direct Lender), also allegedly misrepresented that the companies were a department of, or affiliated with, the consumer’s lender or mortgage servicer. In addition, Shafer and the Perrys falsely claimed that consumers would receive refunds if LMS or Direct Lender failed to secure a loan modification. In many cases, the defendants failed to obtain loan modifications for consumers, and some consumers lost their homes while waiting for the promised results. (7/15/2009 release http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/07/loanlies.shtm.) Under the settlement orders, Shafer and the Perrys are banned from selling mortgage relief services. The orders also impose a .2 million judgment that is suspended due to their inability to pay. In addition to the orders against Shafer and the Perrys, the FTC obtained a default order against LMS and Direct Lender, banning them from selling mortgage relief services and ordering them to pay .2 million.

Hope Now Modifications. Brothers Salvatore and Nicholas Puglia, Hope Now Modifications LLC, and Hope Now Financial Services Corporation settled FTC charges that they falsely claimed that they could obtain mortgage loan modifications in all or virtually all cases and would refund consumers’ money if they failed, and that they were affiliated with, or part of, the HOPE NOW Alliance, a free federal homeowner assistance program. (3/24/2009 release http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/03/newhope.shtm). In addition to banning the defendants from selling mortgage relief services, the settlement order against them permanently bars them from misrepresenting any good or service, violating the Telemarketing Sales Rule, selling or otherwise benefitting from their customers’ personal information, and failing to dispose of their customer information properly. The order also imposes a judgment of almost .3 million, which will be suspended when the defendants surrender all of the funds in their bank accounts, which were frozen by the court.

The Commission votes to authorize staff to file the stipulated final orders in Federal Loan Modification Law Center and Loss Mitigation Services were 5-0. The orders were entered by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on July 12, 2010, and July 14, 2010, respectively. The Commission vote to authorize staff to file the stipulated final order in Hope Now Modifications was 5-0. The order was entered by the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on July 12, 2010.

NOTE: Stipulated court orders are for settlement purposes only and do not necessarily constitute an admission by the defendants of a law violation. Stipulated orders have the full force of law when signed by the judge.

The Federal Trade Commission works for consumers to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, visit the FTC’s online Complaint Assistant or call 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357). The FTC enters complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,800 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. The FTC’s Web site provides free information on a variety of consumer topics.

FMD Consumer Blog

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

viagra