February 8, 2012

Don’t Let an “Authorization Hold” Hold You Hostage

CES 2012 – Consumer Electronics Show
consumer

Image by David Berkowitz
Consumer Electronics Show 2012 – Las Vegas, Nevada
(cc) David Berkowitz – www.marketersstudio.com / www.twitter.com/dberkowitz

Posted on 2/3/2012 by
Arlington, VA – Credit is a convenience; it allows you to charge a meal on your credit card, pay for an appliance with an installment plan, or take out a loan to buy a house. With credit you can make a purchase when you lack ready cash, and you can enjoy the purchase while you are paying for it.

However, when dining out at a fancy restaurant or spending the night away in a hotel, it’s important to take notice of what the banking industry calls an “authorization hold.” 

The issue was first identified by BBB of Southern Arizona when a customer complained that a restaurant had put through a charge equal to his bill plus 20%, even though he had left the server’s tip in cash. Upon investigation, Dispute Resolution Specialist Micaela Clubb discovered that it’s a common practice.

How Authorization Holds Work

Here’s how it works: Let’s say your restaurant bill comes to 0 and you give the server your credit card. When they run it through, they put an authorization hold on your account for 0, assuming you’re going to add a nice tip to the bill. But you leave the tip in cash on the table instead. Still, your bank or credit card company “holds” that 0 for a couple of days until the actual amount of your charge is processed…and that means you don’t have access to that . If you are close to your credit limit, it could mean a purchase is declined. If you used a debit card, it could mean a bounced check and overdrafts fees.

Now imagine it’s a hotel stay. You’ve checked in and given a credit card at the front desk. They put an authorization hold on your card for what they think your total bill will be (room charge, taxes, incidentals). If you are staying for several nights, this could amount to a lot of money that you no longer have access to; and when you are traveling, that can be a huge problem.

What You Can Do

Credit card processors discourage vendors from doing these kinds of holds, but they are perfectly legitimate as long as the vendor notifies customers of the practice. BBB advises consumers to keep tabs on their credit and bank accounts online, especially when traveling, and read the fine print on hotel agreements. When dining, pay for your check and tip together with either credit or cash, but not both. And whenever possible, keep a “cushion” of available funds on credit cards by paying off the balance regularly.

For more consumer information you can trust, visit www.bbb.org/news.
BBB Blog RSS Feed

What are the hot new consumer technology companies out of silicon valley area?

Question by Scott F: What are the hot new consumer technology companies out of silicon valley area?
My boss wants me to find the hot new companies in the bay area of California that focus on consumer technologies and i’m hitting a wall. Can anyone tell me of any hot new companies that do consumer technology and not business-to-business.

thanks!

Best answer:

Answer by Feeling Mutual
eBay is hot.

What do you think? Answer below!

Electric avenue

Green Dragon
green

Image by OmarRiva
A green laser beam, some smoke and… a Dragon appears?!?!?

I’m always championing electric cars, but are they ever going to triumph?

Recent figures are not electrifying: just over 1,000 new 100% electric vehicles (EVs) were sold in the UK last year. There are now 2,149 EVs on the road, outnumbered by the 2,500 special points at which to charge them. But here’s the positive spin: last year’s sales are eight times those of 2010. The optimistic might call this a comeback. In 2006 a polemical film on the suppression of EV technology by the car industry, Who Killed the Electric Car?, suggested the plug had already been pulled.

There are issues. Number one is our binary approach to personal transportation. We buy a car. We drive it. Sometimes, we put petrol in. Who wants extra complications, such as “range anxiety”? But the distance covered has improved. The Nissan Leaf (the world’s first mass-produced electric car) claims a range of 100 miles per charge. Research shows that 80% of our car journeys are pitifully short (and therefore disproportionately polluting in a normal car) and well within the capability of an EV.

Nevertheless we still want the ability to drive the length of the country. By March there will be a national registry of charge points – pod-point.com – and critically, these are fast-charging points: drivers can charge their cars in 20 minutes to two hours rather than eight to 10 hours at home. In fact we’re lucky EVs haven’t taken off. If they were charging on every street, the grid would be at peak levels a lot of the time – expensive and not very green.

So, for the time being, electric cars remain a slightly greener runaround second car for a tiny number of well-off families who care about reducing their emissions and want to future-proof against petrol price hikes. And, let’s face it, EVs really are pricey. Despite the availability of the Plug-in Car Grant (luckily so underused that it’s not in danger of getting cut by the government), which offers a 25% subsidy on ultra-low-emission cars, the “affordable” Nissan Leaf would still cost you almost £26,000.

Having tried to kill them, car manufacturers are now keen to flog EVs to consumers. But they need to think far less conservatively. We need leasing models, collaborative consumption, second-hand EV markets, entire fleets turned over if they’re to reach their heroic potential. Already EVs make more sense as fleet vans – short journeys, no petrol costs. It could be that white-van man is the one to get them off the starting grid.

If you have an ethical dilemma, send an email to Lucy at lucy.siegle@observer.co.uk or visit guardian.co.uk/profile/lucysiegle to read all her articles in one place

Lucy Siegle


guardian.co.uk © 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Environment: Ethical and green living | guardian.co.uk

How do computers lower search costs for producers and consumers?

Question by : How do computers lower search costs for producers and consumers?
How do computers lower search costs for producers and consumers? What effect does this have on price equilibrium?

Best answer:

Answer by ozone dude
Computers(along with the internet) help producers search for raw materials and new markets.Instead of hiring people for searching raw materials and markets producers can do it easily through the internet similarly consumers will also save a lot of money on transportation by shopping through the internet.This will ultimately reduce the price of commodities since the cost of production decreases.

What do you think? Answer below!

Buying Generic Doesn’t Save Shoppers As Much As It Used To

CES 2012 – Consumer Electronics Show
consumer

Image by David Berkowitz
Consumer Electronics Show 2012 – Las Vegas, Nevada
(cc) David Berkowitz – www.marketersstudio.com / www.twitter.com/dberkowitz

Used to be, back in the days of yore, shoppers looking for a deal in the grocery store could go for a generic store brand item instead of the more expensive name brands. But lately the gap between those two options has been narrowing, to the point where store brands sometimes even cost more than their previously pricier counterparts.

Many consumers turned to the tactic of store brands during the recession, to the point that now, a lot of us actually prefer our generic items for the basics at the grocery store and have become loyal to those brands instead.

According to the Wall Street Journal (via Time), stores have caught on and are raising the prices of their private-label goods, to the tune of 5.3% on nonperishables and a whopping 12% for perishables. Name brand prices aren’t rising at the same pace, at only 1.9% and 8% on those respective categories, but still cost on average about 29% more than generic brands.

“It’s much less about value and price than it used to be,” says Clarkston Consulting analyst Steve Rosenstock, who conducted a two-month study last fall across major grocery and drugstore chains to examine why shoppers buy store brands. He says 28% of his survey respondents didn’t cite price as a factor in choosing store brands over name brands–loyalty and positive experiences, instead, drove their purchasing decisions.

Stores have caught on and updated their boring, bland brand labels and created more exciting, attractive packaging for their products. And they’re not afraid to price those items above their name brand counterparts. For example, Target’s Archer Farms line of snacks and drinks are easily recognizable and loved by customers for their pretty logos and familiar branding.

To fight back, name brands are offering more coupons, deals and discounts to woo customers back to the fold, as well as trying to bring the cost of their products down.

Who knows, if store brand prices keep rising and name brands continue to lower theirs in response, we could see a complete switcheroo, with generics on top and name brands signaling cost-efficient options.

Store Brands Step Up Their Game, and Prices [Wall Street Journal]

Why We’re Now Paying More For Generic Groceries [Time.com]

The Consumerist

Facebook Officially Files For IPO; World Continues To Turn

CES 2012 – Consumer Electronics Show
consumer

Image by David Berkowitz
Consumer Electronics Show 2012 – Las Vegas, Nevada
(cc) David Berkowitz – www.marketersstudio.com / www.twitter.com/dberkowitz

Facebook, the startup website that the kid from Squid & the Whale was accused of stealing from those twins in that pistachio commercial (or at least that’s what I learned from fast-forwarding through The Social Network), is finally set to join the ranks of the publicly traded. The company has filed papers for its initial public offering, which is expected to make a bunch of people really, really rich and maybe, just maybe, make us all love one another again.

The documents, in which Facebook sets a very humble preliminary goal of billion, were filed earlier today with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The actual pricing of the stock or date it will be tossed into the water like so much bloody chum is yet to be announced, though it’s all expected to happen in May.

Facebook claims 845 million users (though we expect that a good chunk of those are duplicates used by Zynga addicts to game the Farmville system) and annual revenue of .7 billion.

Morgan Stanley will be the lead bank for the IPO, so hat’s off to them for landing what’s expected to be somewhere around 0 million in fees from the offering.

Facebook files for IPO; hopes to raise billion [LA Times]

The Consumerist

It Starts With the Consumer

Every day we strive to give consumers the content and online experiences they want. Here are some of their stories.

www.FutureMoneyTrends.com The socialist Republic of the United States TRUTH http Stimulus 2 www.boston.com consumers changing www.ft.com World cutts off US spending spree www.washtimes.com separate from the 700 billion dollar bail out, gov to spend 40 billion a month buying up sub-prime and alt-A debt. www.bloomberg.com The nationalization of banks in the socialist republic of the United States www.breitbart.com GM and Ford www.cnbc.com A run away inflation train, Jim Rogers www.cnbc.com
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Question by : What is the financial ramification of a nation of consumers?
The United States is now a nation of consumers rather than a nation of producers. Do you agree or disagree and what does this mean to our economic future?

Best answer:

Answer by Michael H
Just a few examples to negate what you’re saying:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-05-17/factories-in-u-s-see-bigger-2011-sales-gains-ism-says.html

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_22/b4230011766104.htm

Also, take a look at the US’s GDP.

What do you think? Answer below!

Look Out for Super Bowl Scams

CES 2012 – Consumer Electronics Show
consumer

Image by David Berkowitz
Consumer Electronics Show 2012 – Las Vegas, Nevada
(cc) David Berkowitz – www.marketersstudio.com / www.twitter.com/dberkowitz

Posted on 1/24/2012 by

Arlington, VA – With the Super Bowl just around the corner, Better Business Bureau is warning consumers to be on the alert for knock-off team jerseys, counterfeit memorabilia and phony game tickets.

“There are three good reasons not to buy counterfeit goods: theft, quality and security,” notes Katherine Hutt, spokesperson for the Council of Better Business Bureaus. “Counterfeit items are stolen goods. If you love your team, don’t buy a hat or jersey from someone who has stolen the team’s name and logo for their own profit. And counterfeit items are almost always more cheaply made, which means they won’t last as long as the real thing.”

But you may have an even bigger problem if you try to buy counterfeit memorabilia online. Several BBBs around the country have reported websites that don’t even have any merchandise to sell you…they just want your credit card number and personal information in order to steal your identity or drain your bank account. The best way to ensure you are getting official sports gear is to buy directly from the team or league websites, or from official vendors at the stadium.

Beware of Ticket Scams

Tickets for the big game can be an even bigger rip-off. There are thousands of Super Bowl tickets currently listed on Craig’s List, but the site offers no guarantees of any kind and does not require identification of its listers. Buying in person isn’t always an improvement, as it’s gotten easier and easier for scammers to make fake tickets that look real.

So where can you turn? Sites such as Stub Hub (www.stubhub.com) guarantee your tickets’ authenticity. There were 2,800 tickets available as of yesterday, starting at ,450 a piece. Ticketmaster (www.ticketexchangebyticketmaster.com) handles ticket exchanges for the NFL, and had over 800 tickets available as of yesterday, starting at ,864.

In general, avoid scams by being skeptical of:

  • Offers that sound “too good to be true”
  • Pushy sales tactics
  • Poor quality of merchandise
  • Offers that require wire transfer of funds

And always check out a business first at www.bbb.org/search.

For more consumer tips you can trust, visit www.bbb.org/news. To sign up to receive our Scam Alerts, visit BBB Scam Source at www.bbb.org/scam.

BBB Blog RSS Feed

Debt Collector Defendants in Payday Lending Case to Pay More Than $294,000 for Illegal Garnishment

CES 2012 – Consumer Electronics Show
consumer

Image by David Berkowitz
Consumer Electronics Show 2012 – Las Vegas, Nevada
(cc) David Berkowitz – www.marketersstudio.com / www.twitter.com/dberkowitz

At the request of the Federal Trade Commission, a federal court has ordered one of the individuals behind a payday lending scheme and two companies he controlled to pay 4,536 for illegally trying to garnish borrowers’ wages, and for using other illegal debt-collection practices.

The Order bans Joe S. Strom and two companies he controls from the illegal lending and collection practices challenged by the FTC in this case.

The FTC filed its complaint against the defendants in March 2010, as part of its continuing crackdown on scams that target consumers in financial distress. In granting the FTC’s motion for summary judgment, the court found that the defendants sought repayment of loans they made by taking money from borrowers’ paychecks. Online loan applicants checked a box indicating their agreement with loan terms, including an inconspicuous “wage assignment” clause providing that their wages would be garnished to cover delinquent loan payments. The court held that the clause violated the FTC’s Credit Practices Rule, which bans wage ssignment clauses in consumer contracts in many cases.

U.S. law allows federal agencies – but not private companies – to require employers to garnish employees’ wages without a court order when the employees owe the government money. The court determined that the defendants misrepresented that they had the same collection rights as the government. The court also found that the defendants falsely told consumers’ employers that the consumers knew their pay would be garnished and had had an opportunity to dispute the debt, in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and the FTC Act, and that they violated the FDCPA by telling employers and co-workers about consumers’ debts without their consent.

The Order prohibits Strom, LoanPointe, LLC and Eastbrook, LLC, also doing business as Ecash and Getecash, from misrepresenting either the available terms, rates, conditions, or amounts of any loans or other extensions of credit; or any other fact that is relevant to a consumer’s decision to obtain credit.

The defendants also are prohibited from:

  • including a wage assignment clause in their contracts with consumers;
  • misrepresenting to an employer that they are legally authorized to garnish an employee’s wages without first obtaining a court order;
  • contacting or assisting others to contact a consumer’s employer unless they have a valid court order authorizing wage garnishment, or they are seeking information about the consumers’ location;
  • contacting or assisting others to contact any third party in search of information about the consumer’s location unless they do so in a way that complies with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act; or
  • disclosing or assisting others to disclose a consumer’s debt or supposed debt to a third party, with certain exceptions.

The Order also prohibits the defendants from violating the Truth in Lending Act, the Credit Practices Rule, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Source: FTC

Federal Trade Commission v. LoanPointe, LLC, Eastbrook, LLC, also d/b/a ECash and Getecash, Joe S. Strom, Benjamin J. Lonsdale, James C. Endicott, and Mark S. Lofgren

(United States District Court for the Central District of Utah)
Case No. 2:10 CV-00225 DAK – FTC File No. 102-3021

FMD Consumer News

Powered by Yahoo! Answers